Click to read
Welcome to the Mancos River Restoration & Resilience Planning Group webpage.
This working group formed in the spring of 2015 with a shared interest to understand the current status of the Mancos River and work collaboratively to identify opportunities for restoration and building resilience in the watershed.
Meetings were held in April, May, July, and September where the group identified an initial interest in (1) assessing current and future conditions of the Mancos River, (2) identify stakeholder priorities, opportunities and concerns for future projects. On October 1, 2015 the group convened to review the state of the baseline information and knowledge of trends in the Mancos Watershed.
The group is currently identifying next steps that include:
- Drafting the “State of the Mancos River” to summarize the October 1 data sharing event and complete an assessment of the current conditions for existing data
- Develop a list of needed data and information to supplement baseline data
- Update the list of projects from the Mancos Watershed Plan that have been completed (Phases I-II)
- Plan for Phase III that would include future priorities for information (changes in community, vegetation, forests, and water supplies).
On this webpage you will find meeting minutes, quick links, publications and materials and upcoming meeting information in the sidebar. Data and materials can be found or added to at the MRR drop box. If you would like to to post material, presentations or links on this webpage, email firstname.lastname@example.org.
October 1, 2015 meeting Notes
Please send Marcie your presentation to have it attached here and made available as meeting materials.
Resilience, Climate and a Changing World – Marcie Bidwell - presentation
Update on the Mancos River and Watershed – Ann Oliver - presentation
Mesa Verde National Park Science Update – Steve Monroe - presentation
MEVE – Ideas for Progress – George San Miguel - see notes
Reclamation in the East Fork - Kirstin Brown - Presentation
Riverine Ecology and the Value of the Mancos to UMU – Tomo Natori - See Notes
Trout Unlimited update - Duncan Rose - See notes
RSRA - Pete Stacey and Alison (Wild Utah) - See Notes
The Alpine Hydrology Course was a course held in March of 2015 to provide education and a framework for teachers, informal educators and interested parties to teach Alpine Hydrology in their classrooms. The course was attended by eighteen educators from around the Four Corners. Please see the course materials links for materials that you can use in your classroom. These materials can help you teach Alpine Hydrology in your classroom whether you were able to attend the course in March 2015 or not.
ALPINE HYDROLOGY COURSE MATERIALS:
- Course Syllabus
- Nitrogen Cycle Lesson plan
- Water Storage in the Snow Pack Worksheet
- Data Analysis Guide
- Downloading Data Guide
What do El Nino, off-road vehicle use in Moab, and alpine talus fields have in common? Join scientists from CU-Boulder to explore the connections between snow hydrology and the role of dust in nutrient cycling in the Colorado alpine. Learn how much water is stored in the snowpack and where to find data on current and past snowfall. Build upon this understanding with a primer on links between human activities and biogeochemical cycles, such as the nitrogen cycle, and how they affect the quality of the Colorado water supply.
Mountain Studies Institute, in partnership with Learn More About Climate, National Science Foundation (Award #1124576), Biological Sciences Initiative, and ScienceLIVE, is excited to offer teachers, informal educators, and interested partners a workshop opportunity to learn from expert scientist-educators on bringing the Colorado alpine into their classrooms. We are planning for this year’s Alpine Hydrology workshop to be held for a full day in Durango. Through hands-on/minds-on activities for grades 6-16, we will bring the nitrogen and carbon cycles, and the microbial communities that drive them to life.
The Lower Animas Watershed Based Plan is a study designed to address nutrient impairment and associated total maximum daily load on the lower stretch of the Animas River for the purpose of providing stakeholders and managers with a comprehensive plan to efficiently address the concerns. This study aims to compile data that relates water quality to land use and pollutant sources that will eventually lead to the identification of best management practices that will address the sources and allow for the creation of a strategic plan that managers can use to reduce pollutant loading in the lower Animas River.
Although there have been numerous studies done on this reach of the Animas River and surrounding areas, there is no comprehensive plan that utilizes this data and presents it in a manner that can be used by stakeholders and managers to efficiently address the concerns. The goal of creating an updated plan for the Lower Animas is to compile information and present it in a way that relates water quality data to land use and pollutant sources, identify the best management practices that will best address these sources, and create a strategic plan that managers can use to move forward with implementation.
San Juan Watershed Group (SJWG) and Animas Watershed Partnership (AWP) have undertaken multiple planning efforts which included this stretch of river. The San Juan Basin Watershed Management Plan (SJBWMP; http://www.nmenv.state.nm.us/swqb/Projects/SanJuan/BasinPlan/ SanJuanBasinPlan.pdf) was completed in 2005 as a “Watershed Restoration Action Strategy” (WRAS) and while it gives a qualitative overview of water quality issues within four 8-digit HUCs (Animas River Watershed HUC 14080104, Upper San Juan Watershed HUC 14080101, Blanco Canyon HUC 14080103, and the Middle San Juan Watershed HUC 14080105), it does not include the detail or quantitative loading information necessary to satisfy EPA’s 9 key elements.
The SJWG has been awarded three grants from the New Mexico Environment Department since the completion of the 2005 SJBWMP (Phases I-III of the Collaborative Water Quality Improvement Project for the San Juan Watershed; https://sites.google.com/site/sanjuanwatershedgroup/projects/reports), which funded studies and implementation of associated BMPs. The Animas Nutrient Study, the Irrigation Ditch Nutrient and Bacteria Study, and a portion of the Stormwater Nutrient and Bacteria Study were conducted on the Animas River to identify activities and land use practices that were contributing sources of plant nutrients. The results indicate that a variety of non-point source activities have a cumulative impact in increasing nutrient levels from the Colorado border to the confluence with the San Juan River.
Nutrient enrichment is not only a function of nutrient loading, but also a function of diminished assimilative capacity. Channel modification and other disturbances to the floodplain can adversely affect assimilative capacity. Examples of channel modification and floodplain disturbance include:
- Improper rip-rap and poorly engineered bank stabilization projects
- Loss of wetlands and native riparian habitat
- Bank hardening and cut banks
Stormwater studies done on the San Juan and the La Plata Rivers identified land use practices as possible contributing sources of E. coli bacteria, but this has not yet been investigated on the Animas River. Probable sources of fecal coliform and E. coli bacteria include:
- Livestock grazing and flood irrigation of grazed pasture
- Livestock grazing and holding along perennial streams
- Stormwater runoff from pasture and rangeland
- Stormwater runoff from large ephemeral washes (e.g. Canyon Largo)
- Septic systems
The crucial data gap in all of the above studies conducted by the SJWG is that they do not identify the extent to which the above land uses are present throughout the landscape, or ways to prioritize implementation projects in order to have the maximum reduction in pollutant loading.
SJWG’s recent activities have focused on further identifying the sources of nutrients impairment and E. coli bacteria in the San Juan River and Animas River. The SJWG is in the process of conducting a Microbial Source Tracking (MST) Study, to be completed in 2014, that is designed to identify the source of E. coli bacteria in the river as human, cattle, horse, dog, or waterfowl. The MST and LAWBP studies will allow for implementation of targeted Best Management Practices (BMPs) that address specific sources of bacteria and nutrients in the rivers. The Lower Animas WBP will augment previous studies and the current MST study to provide the detailed, local scale information necessary to address water quality issues along the lower Animas River.
The Animas River Watershed Based Plan (Anderson and Scheid 2010) reports that the Florida River, a perennial tributary, is a significant source of nutrients to the Animas River. Recent measurements have shown high levels of N and P at the inflow of the Florida River to the Animas River In July 2010, of 31 inflows to the Animas River that were sampled between Baker’s Bridge and the CO/NM state line, the Florida River ranked 4th among non-permitted inflows for nitrogen loading and 5th for phosphorus loading.
The Colorado 2005 – 2010 Nonpoint Source Action Plan aims to conduct voluntary nonpoint source projects with active groups of citizens. The Animas Watershed Partnership (AWP), a local watershed organization, has identified two landowners along the Florida River who are interested in implementing pollution reducing BMP’s. The restoration site consists of about 1 mile of the Florida River and floodplain, as it passes through private property.
The Project aims to implement at a local level the goals and objectives of the Colorado NPS Management Plan (2005). The plan identifies reduction of sediment, N and P loading to CO waters as a joint priority with EPA. The Project is focused on reducing loading of these pollutants to the Florida River and to the Animas River. The Project includes monitoring to assess water quality changes associated with BMPs, and proposes outreach linked directly to issues and actions.
In an effort to determine the effectiveness of BMP’s in achieving environmental goals, Mountain Studies Institute (a subcontractor of the SJRCD) and the MRP will conduct collect and assess water samples pre- and post-project BMP implementation. The monitoring data collected during this project will be used to evaluate the chemical, biological, and physical changes to the Florida River and its riparian area after the restoration activities are implemented.
The Wolf Creek Pass area is a unique environment that has been formed by abundant precipitation, high elevation, and steep mountain slopes. These characteristics have formed extensive wetland areas. A private land owner has proposed to build a large development in this area.
The hydrology of the Pass Creek Watershed, located adjacent to the Wolf Creek Ski Area, was investigated to better understand the environmental impacts of future large-scale development of this watershed.
Project Leader: Mark Williams (University of Colorado)
Administered by the Mountain Studies Institute
Synoptic surface water samples were collected on public lands and/or access roads towards the end of snowmelt in June 2006, and analyzed for stable water isotopes, tritium and major solutes (Figure 2). Sample sites included wetlands, springs, and surface waters. High average ANC values of 280 µeq L-1 and average silica of 370 µmoles L-1 suggest water bodies were dominated by groundwater (Table 2). A range of tritium values from 6-8 TU suggest a residence time of 1-5 years (Table 1). δ18O values of around -14‰ suggest recharge primarily by snowmelt.
These results suggest that the source of water for wetlands and springs in the area of the Alberta basin is groundwater rather than new snowmelt runoff. Recharge appears to be snowmelt upgradient of the wetlands complex. Residence time appears to be on the order of 1-5 years. Construction of impervious areas of about 50% in the development area, along with removal of snow for road access and other activities, will likely result in a severe reduction in infiltration. The decrease in infiltration may result in a reduction in groundwater recharge that feeds the wetlands complex.
Therefore there is reason to believe that development up-gradient of the wetlands could have down-gradient impacts by affecting the hydrologic and ecological processes supporting these wetlands. Development may:
- Reduce infiltration through the addition of impervious surfaces: (a) roads, (b) driveways, (c) buildings
- Disrupt ground water flow paths that support the wetlands through (a) construction of basements, (b) burying utilities to depths of 10’ or greater, (c) road cuts
- Drainage systems installed to divert water away from roads and buildings
The Lightner Creek project began in 2009, out of concern for the amount of sediment that Lightner Creek was contributing to the Animas River, particularly during heavy precipitation events. The Lightner Creek Group was formed to address the issue, and includes San Juan Citizens Alliance, Trout Unlimited, City of Durango, and MSI.
The Lightner Creek Group formed the goal of reducing sediment inputs to the Animas, which should improve aquatic habitat and fishing conditions. Phase I of the project was completed by Basin Hydrology in March of 2010. MSI has taken the lead on the Phase II portion with a monitoring effort conducted from March through December 2010.
The main findings from the monitoring work include:
- Total suspended and bed load sediment volumes in Lightner Creek are greater than expected for a stream this size.
- The largest source of sediment to Lightner Creek is from Perrins Canyon.
- Sediment from Perrins Canyon is primarily delivered to Lightner Creek during late summer/early fall rain storms.
- The delivered sediment is mobilized to the confluence with the Animas contributing to water quality reduction downstream.
In 2012 the City of Durango constructed a sediment detention basin at the mouth of Perrins Canyon. We expect this to alleviate much of the short-term sedimentation issues in Lightner Creek. However, the longer-term supply of sediment from Perrins Canyon is still an issue, and of concern because of the maintenance cost associated with cleaning out the sedimentation basin, the gap in our understanding of the hill slope delivery in the canyon, and the possibility of other alternatives to reducing sedimentation to Lightner Creek.
In 2012 MSI will be working with the Animas River Watershed Partnership, and others to evaluate the sediment flux from Perrins Canyon.
What is the Issue?
The Upper Cretaceous Fruitland Formation of the San Juan Basin is presently the second largest gas producing basin in the United States, with total reserves estimated at 1.4 x 109 m3. This geologic formation covers portions of northern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado. There is considerable uncertainty about how coalbed methane production from the Fruitland outcrop may affect the quantity and quality of nearby surface waters, springs, wetlands, and groundwater systems.
What is the Overall Objective of the Investigation?
To describe current groundwater – surface water interactions in the Fruitland Outcrop area, and monitor subsequent changes in hydrology that may occur in association with development of coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs. The scope of the project is southwestern Colorado in eastern La Plata County and western Archuleta County.
What are more specific goals?
1. Map stratigraphic sections, faults and facies variations in the Fruitland Formation in Archuleta County using standard hydro-geologic techniques to: a) Identify and map springs and wetlands along the outcrop of the Fruitland Formation coals, and b) Relate these hydrologic features to the facies heterogeneity in the Fruitland Formation.
2. Provide baseline information on the current isotopic and geochemical content of selected waters (springs, streams, wetlands, near surface saturated areas, deep groundwater) along and near the Fruitland Outcrop prior to development of methane gas production.
3. Monitor future changes in these water bodies that may occur in association with development of CBM resources.
4. Use the isotopic and geochemical information, along with the hydrogeologic mapping information and mathematical models such as principal component analysis and end-member mixing analysis, to estimate residence times, sources, flow paths and ages of these different waters in, near, and below the Fruitland Outcrop prior to development of methane gas production.
5. Use the above information for developing "what if" scenarios that address how methane gas production may affect future surface and ground water quantity and quality along the Fruitland Outcrop
6. Provide the information to stakeholders for informed decision making.
7. Serve as a model for how to evaluate surface-groundwater interactions in the many CBM producing basins.
8. To contribute to the current mission of the COGCC and the San Juan Public Lands Technical Working Group to "Map, Model, Monitor, and Mitigate" impacts along the Fruitland outcrop in eastern La Plata County and western Archuleta County.
What has been done so far on the investigation?
Phase 1: (Goals 1, 2; Partial fulfillment of Goals 4-8).
We collected water samples from streams, springs, shallow groundwater (piezometers), domestic drinking water wells, precipitation, gas wells, and irrigation ditches during low flow (autumn 2008) and high flow (spring/summer 2009). The samples have been analyzed for major ions, oxygen 18 isotope, and tritium. Landowners were sent copies of their individual water chemistry results. Mapping of geologic stratigraphy, wetlands, and seeps has also been completed. Preliminary analysis of results have been completed and are available in a report produced by Dr. Williams and Adrianne Kroepsch.
Geology in Study Area
The light yellow band (approximately horizontal) is the Fruitland Outcrop. City and River locations are labeled. Durango is on the left edge of the map. (Click on map for larger image)
Christopher Peltz, MSI; Dr. Koren Nydick, MSI; Dr. Mark Williams, University of Colorado at Boulder; and Dr. Gary Gianniny, Fort Lewis College
Field Technicians & Assistants:
Jordan VanSickle and Tom Osborn, MSI & Fort Lewis College
Thanks to our collaborators who helped on the project:
A huge thank you to the landowners who cooperated with us on this investigation.
We appreciate input and assistance from San Juan Public Lands (USFS/BLM) staff, including Matt Janowiak, Kelly Palmer, Pam Leschak, Thomas Johnson, Bob Brantlinger, Rick Rymerson, Walt Brown, Dave Swanson, and Brian Parker. Pam Leschak assisted in collecting piezometer samples. Thomas Johnson collected some gas well samples. Bob Brantlinger provided GIS maps.
Thank you to Christine Seibold at the INSTAAR laboratory at University of Colorado at Boulder for coordinating lab analysis of samples.
Thanks to the project funder:
San Juan Public Lands Center - Bureau of Land Management
New Tools for Evaluating Alpine Sensitivity & Water Quality in the Upper Animas Watershed in San Juan County, CO
The primary goal of this EPA-funded project is to take both existing and newly created data relating to water quality and to create an integrated user-friendly set of tools, i.e., maps, tables and GIS application, to be utilized by the San Juan County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), Planning Commissioners and Assessor in making scientifically-based land use decisions—specifically as relates to effects on water quality and human health issues.
First Year Progress
Good progress has been made to date on the first year work plan. In spite of a late start (Aug.1, 2003 related to funding delays), all field work in the first year study areas has been accomplished. Initial polygon maps of land types have been digitized along with water sampling and landmark point files. This data is currently being attributed, checked for accuracy and assembled into GIS. Approximately 20 square kilometers was mapped in Deer Park, Arrastra Gulch and Blair Gulch (twice as much as proposed). Ongoing analysis of water samples is being conducted at University of Colorado this fall. Now that the field season is over, existing water quality data gathered by the Animas River Stakeholders Group (1994-2001) will be arranged into a useful format for county planners.
Second Year Progress
Additional watersheds were mapped and water samples were analyzed. Animas River Stakeholder Group data was organized. All data was displayed spatially using Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping. An interactive web-based mapping tool was created for use by county planners. Results of the project were presented to the San Juan County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), Planning Commissioners, and Assessor in the summer of 2005. MSI also trained the San Juan County planner on how to use the interactive web mapping tool and provided free tuition for the county planner and assessor to attend its Geothechnologies (GIS and GPS) course in October.
Dr. Mark Williams and Kim Raby (University of Colorado), Dr. Bill Simon (Animas River Stakeholders Group), and Bill Ball (Mountain studies Institute). MSI was awarded an EPA-Region 8 Regional Geographic Initiative grant to fund this project.